Comments on: Visual Studio 2010, TR1 and Boost. http://wp.freya.no/2010/06/visual-studio-2010-tr1-and-boost/ Knowledge is power Wed, 01 Feb 2012 17:15:04 +0000 hourly 1 By: kent http://wp.freya.no/2010/06/visual-studio-2010-tr1-and-boost/comment-page-1/#comment-2447 kent Wed, 28 Jul 2010 16:52:30 +0000 http://wp.freya.no/?p=732#comment-2447 Thanks! It should of course be _HAS_CPP0X=0 to disable the headers. My mistake. Thanks!

It should of course be _HAS_CPP0X=0 to disable the headers. My mistake.

]]> By: Rick.Renfrew http://wp.freya.no/2010/06/visual-studio-2010-tr1-and-boost/comment-page-1/#comment-2446 Rick.Renfrew Wed, 28 Jul 2010 16:40:14 +0000 http://wp.freya.no/?p=732#comment-2446 Just a heads up, I stumbled across this blog post when trying to do exactly what you were talking about (disable TR1 in VS2010). I actually had to set _HAS_CPP0X to 0, though, instead of 1 in order to disable the built-in TR1 implementation so I could use boost. I found several places that said to set the macro to 1, so I'm not sure if this was changed recently or something like that. In either case, I figured I'd post this here, hopefully it'll help whoever comes across this next :D. Thanks for the informative post! Just a heads up, I stumbled across this blog post when trying to do exactly what you were talking about (disable TR1 in VS2010). I actually had to set _HAS_CPP0X to 0, though, instead of 1 in order to disable the built-in TR1 implementation so I could use boost.

I found several places that said to set the macro to 1, so I’m not sure if this was changed recently or something like that. In either case, I figured I’d post this here, hopefully it’ll help whoever comes across this next :D . Thanks for the informative post!

]]>