Posts Tagged ‘Game review’

Posted by Kent at 2 August 2009

Category: Game review

Tags: , , ,

It sucks.

That was my first impression.

Right from when I installed it and started it, it took me 30 minutes to get started. 15 minutes of shader generation and 15 minutes of clicking through every small little popup window with “helpful” hints. I got tired after the 2 first “hints”, so I rushed through them all. That was before I got started with actual gameplay.

When the game finally started and I was able to drive a vehicle, guess what! MORE FUCKING POPUPS AFTER MOVING THE VEHICLE 2 METERS[1]

When I got started it seemed like I needed some Games for Windows account to save my progress, and that I couldn’t save the progress without it. I don’t have an account and I don’t intend getting one either.

After about 20 minutes of uninterupted (wow!) playing, I had enough of metre wide pixels and crappy physics.
You see, it doesn’t look good at all with a game running in a default 640×480 resolution on a 26″ monitor – and without the ability to change resolution within the game, it starts to get real bad! And believe me, the graphics and physics in the original Monster Truck Madness from 1996 is miles ahead of FUEL!

And to be fair, I tried to do a second impression after changing the resolution to 1920×1200 pixels. The graphics was far better, but the physics were still crappy.

And to be fair the second time, the idea and concept was and is good. but the wrapping sucks big time! Codemasters might have forgotten that playing games is all about having fun and playing the game, not being able to select paintwork and colors and what the driver should look like. And you must be able to save the game without relying on internet access and Microsoft! And not to forget the ultra-annoying popups!

Sadly, there won’t be a third impression. I kind of liked FUEL after I got started, but without being able to save the game, the final nail in the coffin was nailed.

So, this was an utterly big fail! Its a shame though, the music was good!

Popularity: 3% [?]

Posted by Kent at 1 December 2008

Category: Ikke interessant

Tags: , , , ,

I just bought myself a shiny new GPS yesterday, the choice was hard, but it was Garmin who picked the longest straw. The other competitors was Mio and TomTom.

Garmin nüvi 765T

Garmin nüvi 765T

I’ve had it out for a few testdrives here in Oslo. It had all the roads I were driving and it easily managed to calculate new routes when I turned right when I’ve should have gone straight forward or left.

The display is large and colorful, but the touchscreen is somewhat slow when I try to scroll the map or rotate the map. It’s 3D view of buildings is ok, but it isn’t exactly the latest FarCry2 engine. While driving you want to keep your eyes on the road, not on the 3D buildings, so it doesn’t really matter.

It has lots of Points of Interest (POI), though I’ve only checked some major ones. There are lots of restaurants, bars and gas stations on the map. Big plus for having both IKEAs in Oslo available as a POI! :)

The second time I were out driving wasn’t that cheerful. It’s live traffic alarm wasn’t spot on. In fact, it didn’t get anything right. One place it marked a whole section of the road as road work with a 2 minute delay, but there were none. It also guided me through the busy parts of the city with mostly red traffic lights at every intersection. As a “bonus”, as I might call it, it literally died upon me. Luckily I was familiar in the area so I managed to get home on my own. My wife tried to revive the GPS by holding the off button pressed for a long time. It didn’t respond. It displayed the map from where it froze. When I got home it finally could be revived by pressing the off button for 5 seconds. A big disappointment!

When I’m more familiar with this unit, I’ll post an updated review.

Popularity: 4% [?]